I've just come back from choir rehearsal and while I have some doubts about the selection of music we are singing (and the way we are singing it to a certain extent), to make up for it we are singing "O Holy Night". I only encountered a couple of years ago in another choir setting but I find it wonderfully shiver (in a good way) inducing and it also makes you feel as though your soul is soaring out of your body. This link is the best I could find on YouTube. If the voices are too operatic it does not have the same effect to my mind.
On another note, the debate at the Oxford Union where both Nick Griffin (BNP leader) and David Irving (Holocaust denier) were due to speak has been delayed due to protesters. I'm not sure how I feel about the issue. One person said something very wise about the whole thing. If it had been a debate about the issues such as immigration or history, then offering them a platform is legitimate. In a debate about free speech it is not. A lawyer, who at some point in their career, had defended either of these individuals on the basis on freedom of speech, could, in this instance, be an ideal invitee for the debate. If you are trying to use a debate as a way of holding up weaknesses in NG and DI's ideas, you need to put them up against other ideas. A platform in a free speech debate is treading the fine line between offering a platform to their ideas and endorsing them.
I've realised I should probably change the description of this blog as there is not a lot of geology in it really...
On another note, the debate at the Oxford Union where both Nick Griffin (BNP leader) and David Irving (Holocaust denier) were due to speak has been delayed due to protesters. I'm not sure how I feel about the issue. One person said something very wise about the whole thing. If it had been a debate about the issues such as immigration or history, then offering them a platform is legitimate. In a debate about free speech it is not. A lawyer, who at some point in their career, had defended either of these individuals on the basis on freedom of speech, could, in this instance, be an ideal invitee for the debate. If you are trying to use a debate as a way of holding up weaknesses in NG and DI's ideas, you need to put them up against other ideas. A platform in a free speech debate is treading the fine line between offering a platform to their ideas and endorsing them.
I've realised I should probably change the description of this blog as there is not a lot of geology in it really...